Which of the following is a common treatment approach for aphasia?

The recognition of Constraint-Induced Language Therapy as a common treatment approach for aphasia is well-supported in clinical practice. This method is based on the principle of neuroplasticity and focuses on helping individuals regain language skills by forcing them to communicate despite their limitations. In this therapy, individuals are encouraged to use their verbal language abilities rather than relying on compensatory strategies such as gestures or writing.

The intensity and structured nature of Constraint-Induced Language Therapy involves immersing the person with aphasia in language practice, thereby enhancing their ability to produce language. This approach has been shown to improve speech fluency and overall communication effectiveness in those with aphasia, making it a key intervention in speech-language pathology.

In contrast, while the other approaches mentioned may be beneficial for different speech or language disorders, they are not specifically designed to address the unique challenges associated with aphasia. For example, speech sound discrimination and articulation drills primarily target phonetic or pronunciation issues rather than the higher-level language processing deficits encountered in aphasia. Similarly, visual support strategies can aid communication but do not directly target the underlying language impairments that appear in individuals with aphasia.